Despite the advances in cancer research over the past 40 years, including World Cancer Research Fund’s evidence on cancer prevention, and dramatic advances in cancer treatment, one question remains to be answered: why does one person get cancer when another, who lives a similar lifestyle, does not?
Experts estimate that up to 40% of cancer cases are preventable, if people didn’t smoke, avoided the sun, avoided alcohol, ate a healthy diet, maintained a healthy body weight and stayed physically active. But that doesn’t mean we can reduce our own risk of cancer by 40% if we follow this advice. It’s not easy to estimate an individual’s cancer risk because so many biological and genetic factors are also at play.
And that’s where large databases about our health can make a big difference. One of these is the UK Biobank, which contains details about the health – and increasingly, as the participants get older, the ill-health, of 500,000 people in the UK. The longevity of this data – not just at one point in a person’s life but repeatedly measured over a long period of time – helps us understand what influences cancer risk throughout someone’s life.
Heel bone density to house size
Since 2006, the UK Biobank has been collecting environmental, lifestyle and genetic information about the participants. For scientists, the size, range of information – from heel bone density to blood pressure to the size of their house – and duration of information collected is a gold mine.
It has been described as “the world’s most important health database” yet it’s not the only resource of this type. Another large database established as part of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study has grown into a massive project involving 10 countries, with 521,000 participants and data collected over more than 30 years.
Of the 30,000 registered researchers from 100 countries who have used data from the UK Biobank, some are funded by the World Cancer Research Fund network, and are using the data to investigate a range of cancer risk factors:
- Sleep, sleep patterns, and risk of prostate and endometrial cancer
- Fat tissue and advanced prostate cancer risk
- Social inequality and cancer risk
- Physical activity, sedentary behaviours, and cancer, cardiovascular disease and diabetes
- Plant-based diets
- Ultra-processed food
- Following our Cancer Prevention Recommendations
- Obesity and insulin
- Vegetarian diets
- Links between diabetes and cancer
- How many cancers are linked to obesity and physical activity?
Some of the things our scientists have found out using UK Biobank data include:
- Physical activity across the day – with a peak early in the morning and late in the evening – linked to lower risk of colorectal cancer
- Ultra-processed food increases cancer risk
- Following our Cancer Prevention Recommendations reduces the risk of all cancers
The UK Biobank allows researchers around the world to look at biological and medical data and “supports a diverse range of research intended to improve the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of illness, and the promotion of health throughout society”.
And it’s not easy to get hold of such large amounts of data. It’s hard to get half a million people to consent to sharing their personal data in this way, and even harder to get them to keep filling in surveys and undergoing procedures over many years. This type of research can only be done with people’s support and willingness to consent, and without it, finding ways to prevent and treat diseases such as cancer will be so much harder.
The wealth of data the UK Biobank contains could have drastic implications for cancer research, perhaps even finally helping realise World Cancer Research Fund’s ambition of living in a world where no one dies of a preventable cancer.
What do our grant holders say about UK Biobank?
Prof John Mathers
The scale, rich detail of participant characteristics and behaviours, and robust long-term information on health outcomes make UK Biobank a world-leading resource for studies of many aspects of nutrition and health including cancer risk and survival.
Dr Emma Allott
Whole body imaging data available in UK Biobank has enabled our team to measure the amount of fat surrounding the prostate in a large number of cancer-free men. These men are followed over time by the UK Biobank, giving us the opportunity to explore how the quantity of this fat type is related to future risk of prostate cancer. Studies like UK Biobank are critical for this type of research as the imaging required to measure this fat type is not otherwise available in healthy individuals. The results of our study will provide the first evidence for or against periprostatic fat as a risk factor for aggressive prostate cancer.
Dr Dagfinn Aune
We are using the UK Biobank to study the association between adiposity and physical activity and cancer risk. The very large sample size and the detailed assessment of adiposity measures, physical activity, other risk factors and a range of biomarkers are of major importance for our analyses. All this information helps us study associations with a range of cancer outcomes as well as exploring potential biological mechanisms that may explain or contribute to cancer development.
Dr Fiona Malcomson
Our studies using UK Biobank data have shown that people who adhere more closely to the WCRF/ AICR Cancer Prevention Recommendations have lower risk of developing cancer and, specifically, lower risk of cancer of the breast, bowel, kidney, oesophagus, ovary, liver and gallbladder. UK Biobank data has also enabled us to identify lifestyle and dietary patterns according to sociodemographic factors that will help guide public health strategies for cancer prevention.
Eating a wide variety of food may reduce the risk of gastrointestinal cancers, according to research funded by the World Cancer Research Fund network* and published in the European Journal of Cancer.
Little is known about how eating a wide variety of food species, also known as food biodiversity, may benefit our health or affect our cancer risk. Food species refer to a distinct type of plant or animal, such as wheat, chicken, or salmon. For example, salmon, mackerel, and tuna are all separate food species, even though they share some biological traits and belong to the same food group. Similarly, rocket, lettuce and spinach count as separate food species, even though they are all leafy green vegetables. However, chicken and a chicken’s egg belong to the same food species even though they are different types of food.
This study is the first to examine how the number of different food types consumed, measured as Dietary Species Richness (the number of species an individual consumes per year) affects the risk of the following gastrointestinal cancers:
- Oesophagus
- Throat
- Stomach
- Bowel
- Colon
- Rectum
- Gallbladder
- Pancreas
- Liver
The study followed 450,111 cancer-free adults in 9 European countries from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort for 14 years. The researchers, from the International Agency for Research on Cancer, found that individuals with the most diverse diets, by including more food species in their diet, had a 23% lower risk of developing gastrointestinal cancers compared with those with the least variety. The risk decreased by 6% for every 10 extra species per year added to their diet. People can do this by including more variety in the types of fruit and vegetables they eat, for example, choosing to eat local and seasonal fruit and vegetables of different colours.
Food biodiversity includes eating different types of food that provide the necessary nutrients for maintaining health. Investigating food biodiversity is important because it has the potential to benefit public health and sustainable food systems.
Dr Helen Croker, our Assistant Director of Research and Policy, said: “Diets have become more limited in the types of foods eaten and they are often high in fat, sugar and salt. However, for cancer prevention, it’s important to eat a healthy, balanced and varied diet with plenty of wholegrains, pulses, vegetables and fruit.”
Dr Helen Croker
This study is particularly interesting because it looks at the number of different foods people eat and the impact it can have on their cancer risk, in particular gastrointestinal cancers. More research is now needed to confirm these findings and further explore the link between dietary diversity and cancer prevention.
Dr Inge Huybrechts
This study shows how a more diverse diet, including a large variety of species, could lower the risk of gastrointestinal cancers, emphasising the importance of eating a wide variety of foods. The idea behind a diverse diet consisting of many types of plants and animals species may provide essential nutrients for the body while also strengthening ecosystems, making them more resilient, productive, and sustainable.
This study was funded by Wereld Kanker Onderzoek Fonds based in the Netherlands, as part of the World Cancer Research Fund International network.

Achieving a balanced combination of exercise and controlling our waistline is far more effective in reducing our risk of cancer than doing just one or the other, according to a study funded by World Cancer Research Fund.
In the world’s first study looking at the effectiveness of combining these measures, we found that only doing one is not enough to lower our risk of cancer. The study, which looked at more than 300,000 people, found that:
- People not meeting World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on waist circumference are at 11% greater risk, even if they are physically active.
- People not meeting WHO guidelines for physical exercise are at 4% greater risk, even if “abdominally lean” (ie they have a smaller waist).
- Achieving neither means a 15% greater risk.
The study – WHO guidelines on waist circumference and physical activity and their joint association with cancer risk (Lead researcher: Prof Michael Leitzmann, University of Regensburg) – was published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.
Prof Michael Leitzman
We're excited about the insights we’ve uncovered regarding the interplay between waist circumference and physical activity in reducing cancer risk. Our findings highlight the value of addressing multiple factors together, showing that both maintaining a recommended waist size and being physically active are critical for cancer prevention. This research reinforces the importance of practical, achievable changes that can have a meaningful impact on health over time.
Dr Helen Croker
This is the first study to examine the independent and combined impact of waist circumference and physical activity levels. The findings underscore the importance of a holistic approach instead of focusing on a single factor to reduce cancer risk. Maintaining a healthy weight and, in particular, having a waist circumference within the recommended level and being physically active, along with eating a healthy diet, are all crucial steps to reduce cancer risk. People can start by making small, sustainable changes like incorporating regular movement into daily routines or choosing healthier food options.
World Cancer Research Fund has been at the forefront of cancer prevention in the UK and globally for decades. We developed Activ8, a free 8-week programme to encourage people to move more, eat well and reduce their cancer risk. Every step is backed by science and brings our Cancer Prevention Recommendations to life.
Science and football – while they may not seem like they have much in common, the disciplines meet in the person of Dr Frankie Brown. Frankie is an immunologist and former member of Scotland’s women’s team who has represented her country 96 times on the international stage.
Our funding helped Frankie realise her other dream of researching ways exercise can benefit those living with and beyond cancer.
Helping people with blood cancer

Frankie Brown with her Scotland team-mates
Under Dr Campbell from the University of Bath, Frankie worked in a team on a project funded by us investigating the effects of exercise on the health of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, a form of blood cancer that affects around 4,000 new people every year in the UK.
The team evaluated the safety and feasibility of a progressive exercise programme for these patients – many who were over 60. Essentially, they tested a “recipe for how to run a big study” more effectively, and even adapted it to continue successfully during the COVID pandemic.
She was inspired by her own background as a professional footballer, as well as her personal experience with cancer:
“When I was finishing up my PhD, my mum died of breast cancer. That was a real trigger moment for me to look more into oncology. I just couldn’t get my head around it – she had been so healthy. I would wonder, what’s going on here?
“I already knew a lot about health and monitoring my body for football. I started playing football very young, playing with my little brother, and I haven’t stopped since. I was in the Scotland under 17s, then the under 19s, and got into the full squad when I was 21 and was there for 10 years.
“Having spent my whole life in a high-performance environment, with everything being tested and monitored, I became more aware of how my body reacts to even very small shifts in circumstances and situations. It wasn’t hard for me to see how those tiny changes that are so important to athletes can be important for everybody.”
This inspired Frankie to become a researcher, where she found herself on the team led by Dr Campbell and funded by us. There were, however, some setbacks along the way – the biggest being the COVID-19 pandemic. Thanks to the flexibility of our funding programme, Frankie says she and the rest of the team were able to pivot from designing the programme to be in-person, to buying the participants exercise bikes and running a group session over Zoom.
“We had to shift the whole design of the exercise sessions to be home-based and World Cancer Research Fund allowed us to deliver exercise bikes to the participants’ homes. Without that, the trial would have fallen apart.“
‘The more muscle mass you have as you get older, the more independent you will be’
The data showed a 2% increase in lean mass in the exercise group compared with a 0.4% decrease in the control group. This is a significant benefit, as Frankie explains: “The data we have now and the study we’ve done shows that any gain a patient can make with their performance can make a huge difference to their own wellbeing.
“An increase in lean mass – in other words, in muscle mass – in these patients is a huge thing, especially in people over 60. The more muscle mass you have as you get older the more independent you will be. One of our participants lived up some stairs, and whenever I think about the study, I think about them and hope that my work has made it easier for them to get the shopping up and down to their home.”
These results have informed the design of a larger study where Frankie and her team will assess the tumour-suppressing effects and mechanisms of exercise in humans.
Frankie is very vocal about the impact of our support on her work: “In my experience, World Cancer Research Fund has been incredibly supportive of me as a young academic. They’ve provided amazing flexibility at a very uncertain time. I wouldn’t have been able to achieve any of this without you.”